ET NEWS

The debt mutual funds have seen an outflow of Rs 7,979 crore in August against an inflow of Rs 1.06 lakh crore in July. In August 2024, debt mutual funds received an inflow of Rs 45,169 crore.According to an analyst, this sharp reversal from robust inflows in July was primarily driven by significant redemptions in liquid funds and institutional investors have trimmed their allocations ahead of advance tax payments and quarter end liquidity needs.Also Read | Mutual fund cash holdings slip below 5% to 9-month low in August; PPFAS, Kotak MF raise stakes“Open-ended debt mutual funds witnessed net outflows of INR 7,980 crore in August 2025, a sharp reversal from the robust inflows of INR 1.07 lakh crore seen in July. The decline was primarily driven by significant redemptions in the liquid fund category, which saw a pullback after last month’s surge. Institutional investors trimmed allocations ahead of advance tax payments and quarter-end liquidity needs, underscoring the category’s sensitivity to short-term cash management cycles,” according to Nehal Meshram, Senior Analyst – Manager Research, Morningstar Investment Research India.Among the 16 sub-categories, most of the categories saw outflows except for overnight funds, ultra short duration funds, low duration, money market, short duration, medium duration, and gilt fund with 10-year constant duration.Overnight funds received the highest inflow of Rs 4,950 crore in August, followed by money market funds receiving an inflow of Rs 2,210 crore in the same time period. Medium-duration funds received the lowest positive inflow of Rs 111 crore in the mentioned period.Liquid funds witnessed the highest outflow of Rs 13,350 crore in August, followed by gilt funds which saw an outflow of Rs 928 crore in the same period.The expert adds that while liquid funds dragged overall flows into negative territory, other segments continued to attract investor interest. Nehal said that the overnight funds witnessed inflows maintaining their appeal as a safe and instantly accessible investment option and the money market funds, which had recorded record inflows in July, saw moderated inflows, reflecting a natural slowdown after months of elevated additions.In the current calendar year so far, debt funds have received a total inflow of Rs 2.19 lakh crore whereas in the current financial year, these funds have received an inflow of Rs 3 lakh crore.Also Read | Largecap mutual funds see highest jump in monthly inflows by 33% to Rs 2,834 crore in August. Are investors chasing safety? The expert believes that investor appetite for shorter-duration carry strategies remained robust, with categories offering stability, liquidity, and modest accrual continuing to find favor. “Short Duration, Low Duration, and Ultra Short Duration funds collectively attracted nearly Rs 1,416 crore, signaling a steady preference for low-volatility accrual strategies. In contrast, Corporate Bond Funds and Banking & PSU Funds faced combined outflows of approximately Rs 1,625 crore, as investors likely booked profits and shifted focus to more liquid, shorter-tenor options,” she added.According to a monthly note by Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI), the AUM of open-ended debt funds declined marginally by 0.2% on-month to Rs 18.71 lakh crore in August from Rs 18.76 lakh crore in July, which can partly be attributed to outflows during the month.

The market regulator, Sebi in its board meeting held on Friday, approved proposals facilitating enhanced investor protection and financial inclusion in the mutual fund space. Here’s a breakdown of the changes based on the board’s decisions:1. Slashing maximum permissible exit loadSebi has reduced the maximum permissible exit load from 5% to 3%. According to the market regulator, the present regulatory framework for mutual funds (MFs) permits mutual fund schemes to charge a maximum exit load of 5%, which gets credited back to the scheme. However, mutual funds generally charge exit loads in the range of 1% to 2%. Hence, reducing the maximum exit load would align the regulatory requirement with the prevailing industry practice. Setting the maximum cap at 3% was found appropriate so as to strike a better balance between investor protection and flexibility for schemes having exposure to less liquid securities.Also Read | Mutual fund cash holdings slip below 5% to 9-month low in August; PPFAS, Kotak MF raise stakes2. Revision of incentive structure for MF distributors from B-30 citiesThe market regulator has decided to revise the incentive structure and provide incentive to distributors only for investment/inflows from new individual investors (new PAN) from B-30 cities. The market regulator has decided that the incentive will be provided to the distributor for new investor at the industry level and such incentive shall be capped at 1% of the first application amount (in case of lumpsum investment) or total investment during the first year (in case of SIP) subject to a maximum of Rs 2,000.3. Considering scope of gender inclusion in mutual fund spaceConsidering the scope of gender inclusion in the mutual fund space, the market regulator has decided to incentivize distributors to create awareness and promote financial inclusion among women investors. It has further decided that an additional commission shall be paid to distributors for investment/inflows from new women individual investors (new PAN) at the industry level. The computation and payment of such commission shall be on the same lines as for B-30 incentive.According to the release by Sebi, these proposals were placed before the Mutual Fund Advisory Committee in January 2023 then a consultation paper was issued in May 2023 for public comments. Further, in order to ensure alignment with the view of the industry, the proposals were also discussed with industry stakeholders in July 2025 and based on the feedback from the industry the above proposals were finalized and placed before the Board for consideration.Also Read | Largecap mutual funds see highest jump in monthly inflows by 33% to Rs 2,834 crore in August. Are investors chasing safety?Some other key decisionsSebi in order to facilitate enhanced participation of mutual funds in Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Infrastructure Investment Trusts (InvITs), has approved the amendments to SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 for inter- alia re-classifying REITs as “equity” and retaining the “hybrid” classification for the InvITs, for the purpose of investments by Mutual Funds and Specialized Investment Funds (SIF).The re-classification was proposed, inter-alia considering the characteristics of REITs i.e., being more inclined towards equity, relatively more liquid, and to ensure alignment with global practices. InvITs, on the other hand being products primarily privately placed with more stable cash flows and having lesser liquidity, the hybrid classification was proposed to be retainedAccording to the release by Sebi, pursuant to the re-classification of REITs, investment by mutual funds shall be considered within the investment allocation limit for equity instruments and also make them eligible for inclusion in equity indices, thereby enabling enhanced investment by mutual fund schemes in REITs.Further, as a result of equity classification of REITs, the existing investment limit applicable for both REITs and InvITs would now be exclusively available for InvITs, thereby facilitating growth in this segment also.The aforementioned proposals were prepared factoring in feedback received in public consultation in April 2025, and detailed deliberations with the Mutual Fund Advisory Committee (MFAC), concerned industry associations and stakeholders.

The University of California, Berkeley has provided information on 160 students and faculty to the Trump administration as part of a federal investigation into alleged antisemitic incidents on campus. The move comes amid heightened government scrutiny of universities over pro-Palestinian protests. The University of California’s Office of the President said campuses like Berkeley often receive requests from federal and state agencies. It added, “UC is committed to protecting the privacy of our students, faculty, and staff to the greatest extent possible, while fulfilling its legal obligations.”Trump has warned of federal funding cuts for institutions accused of tolerating antisemitism. The administration alleges some campuses permitted antisemitism during demonstrations over Israel’s military actions in Gaza. Pro-Palestinian protestors, including Jewish groups, argue the government is mislabelling their criticism of Israel and advocacy for Palestinian rights as antisemitism. Legal experts have raised concerns that the administration’s actions may undermine free speech and academic freedom. Local media reported that UC Berkeley informed the 160 affected individuals that their details were provided to the US Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. The federal government has not issued a statement. The administration has settled similar cases with other universities. Columbia University agreed to pay more than $220 million, while Brown University will pay $50 million. Settlement discussions with Harvard University continue. At UCLA, federal officials had proposed a $1 billion settlement, which California Governor Gavin Newsom rejected as an “extortion attempt.” Rights advocates highlight a parallel rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab sentiment and Islamophobia linked to the Middle East conflict. Critics note that the government has not launched equivalent investigations into Islamophobia.(With inputs from Reuters)